[War Declaration] Starship Troopers [S_T] vs. Flotte Bekloppter Idioten [FBI]

Well if he had 2k and has 20 i can imagen he has been cleaned out.
At the moment we dont have to be perfect, there can be a margin.
But if he had 48 and now has 10 well it wont count

Stv3N wrote:

Terminator wrote:

How does the "cleaner point" work?
yesterday i cleaned a guy to 0, but now he build new ships...

Most members of an Alliance at zero, the other alliance will get the "cleaner" goal.
Its important to say, that if the member was at 0 at the start of the war, its not possible to clean his troops.
If at any weekly update he has troops and the next week he loses them, then he would count towards this goal.

As said before, points are calculated weekly.
Once there is the system is implemented by ravenc (in the future) this points could be calculated in real time.

I think this should be the opposite. An alliance in a war with players that do not build troops should be punished for that, instead of rewarded by not having troops to lose... If my worst players all stay at 0 the whole war, and im not punished for that, it gives me a HUGE advantage. I think once you have developed this more, a moderator should use the admin control panel to see how many times during each week a player on each team hit 0, and tally that number, adding one for any player never leaving 0 points during that week.

edit: exception should be players on vacation mode, as they are a negative already as well, they should not be two negatives for also being on 0 troop points

Yes, you are correct but i do not have those tools, since we have never needed to keep track of a player that is at 0.
These type of things would have to be requestes just for this war system that ravenc wasnt planing to implement for a while, and suddenly i appeared with one hahah

Yes vacatoin mode will be exception and also players inactive more than 7days for example (They can be kicked from alliance without negative point)

Sorry for the delay and i do apologize.
This will be handled today!

War overvie has been Updated!
Weekly point has been asigned to S_T

You can see Goals asigned on 1st post of page 1
Current War Points:

S_T: 2
FBI: 5

Terminator wrote:

Is there any trick to get it copied in the right formate. It's no fun to add all Blank lines and spaces -.-

If you copy to notebook then copy that to the board, the formating of the battle appears good.
Anyway, at the moment there is no other way.
Hopefully in the future we will have a combat packer for those individual fights and a farming packer, that shows the total of all units killed/lost and total resources stolen


EDIT: Nearly spamed myself there

On my browser I have two options, "paste" and "paste original text", the first reformats without spaces, the second shows a good report

Had the pleasure to test it immediately Both ways are working fine. Thanks guys!

Apocaliptick wrote:

Date	Alliance	Goal	Points
24/03/15	S_T	Ascent	1
24/03/15	S_T - Soja	Assasin	1
24/03/15	S_T	D-Day	-1
24/03/15	S_t	Suicide	-1

[/align]

What Alliance left in zero troops to Soja82? And if another Alliance did some ... That equal sum points for FBI? Soja82 should show the reports of battles which left it in zero points in troops.

Actually, I left Soja at zero points xD but I expected for the zero troops points to be valid only with battle reports, so you are right, it wasn't FBI, it was me.

FenixDown wrote:

Actually, I left Soja at zero points xD but I expected for the zero troops points to be valid only with battle reports, so you are right, it wasn't FBI, it was me.

Then the points are for you Not for FBI

And why the hell do you intermeddle...? He is inactiv and were a perfect point for us...

But shouldn't change to much. If the BA wants to look, Grand and xxxtripol would be at 0... but I know. Its not Sunday

By my understanding so far, it does not matter who puts the player down to 0 points, but that the player was reduced to 0 during that week. Part of war is to have outside friends/strangers that decide to help one side or the other (for personal benefit usually, as was with fenix/soja in this case.) It shouldnt prevent you from getting that point. Also, your being in a war shouldnt keep you from being attacked by outsiders....

Well. If its like you said, I dont care. (Wanted to attack soja a few hours later. So it happend anyway. And his main I killed)
But its a bit unfair to ST, isn't it?
It's a code of honor that you won't manipulate/affect a war you don't fight.

If there were a few hundred other people on the server, i may agree with you. but with the way the server looks right now, nobody in war is exempt from being a farm target by people outside of the war. to suggest otherwise is silly. I would war bad allys just to be exempt from attacks. If S_T takes offense to attacks that happen, they have the right to respond too, but I feel that they know that any attacks are based on personal gain, not swaying the war... I would imagine that FBI has also been attacked/farmed by outsiders...

Terminator wrote:

Well. If its like you said, I dont care. (Wanted to attack soja a few hours later. So it happend anyway. And his main I killed)
But its a bit unfair to ST, isn't it?
It's a code of honor that you won't manipulate/affect a war you don't fight.

Fenix didnt attack Soja to help you, he attacked on his own, becouse FBI and ST are at war it doesent mean they cannot be attacked by outsiders

Im not going to debate what "outsiders" can do or not, i find it pointless.
The cleaner point was given because its not exactly easy to prove who puts who to 0.
I only see reports and points, how can i know how many troops he had in the moment of the attack?

I think in our new combat posting format, we should require that the poster post what the ending points are after the attack (hard to require people have the before as well). This will let people make the claim that they put someone to 0

I have attacked members on ST too, I'm not going to stop attacking because the alliance is at war and even then, I waited 24 hours inactivity to attack so ITS your fault for not attacking before, who the hell waits in the middle of a war to attack someone going inactive for a whole day?

Anyway... @RaVenC stepped in at a good moment, since he started to think about the War System, with this ingame it will be much simple to prepare a war and no need for complicated stuff